Iraq’s economic trajectory over the past decades reveals a paradox: substantial oil wealth alongside persistent underdevelopment and weak structural transformation. As a middle-income country, Iraq faces the well-documented “middle-income trap,” where early growth driven by resource rents and capital accumulation fails to evolve into sustained productivity- and innovation-led development. Despite vast natural resources, Iraq has achieved only limited income convergence with advanced economies.
Globally, economic growth has slowed since the 1980s, particularly among developing and middle-income countries. While many nations followed neoliberal reforms associated with the Washington Consensus—emphasizing privatization, deregulation, and trade liberalization—results were often disappointing. In contrast, East Asian economies adopted developmental state models, combining strong government coordination, industrial policy, export promotion, and high capital formation. These strategies enabled structural transformation and successful catch-up.
Iraq’s experience reflects many symptoms of the resource curse and Dutch disease. Oil revenues have fueled exchange rate appreciation, expanded imports, and weakened domestic tradable sectors. Rather than fostering industrialization, oil income has largely financed consumption and a service-heavy non-oil economy. Services now account for roughly 70 percent of non-oil GDP, signaling premature deindustrialization without a prior manufacturing base capable of driving productivity growth.
Capital formation remains low and inefficient, often barely covering depreciation. Oil revenues have not been effectively channeled into manufacturing, agriculture, or export-oriented sectors. This underinvestment constrains productive capacity and limits diversification. Empirical analysis in the study shows weak relationships between exchange rate movements and growth, and a generally negative but nonlinear relationship between inflation and GDP growth, suggesting that macroeconomic stabilization alone cannot resolve structural weaknesses.
Labor market conditions further highlight Iraq’s imbalance. Labor force participation remains around 38 percent, with unemployment exceeding 15 percent, particularly among youth and women. Growth driven by the capital-intensive oil sector generates limited employment. Cross-country evidence shows a negative correlation between productivity growth and employment elasticity, underscoring the importance of balanced strategies that promote both productivity and job creation.
The central conclusion is clear: Iraq’s challenge is structural, not financial. Overcoming volatility, unemployment, and stagnation requires a deliberate shift toward industrialization, higher and more efficient capital formation, and a coherent developmental state strategy capable of transforming oil wealth into sustainable economic diversification.
To read the full analysis, please click on the attached PDF file.
Comments